Francesco Maestrelli vs Matteo Gigante Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Apr at 04:44 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Maestrelli vs M. Gigante

ITA
2
Win
Played
3
Win

ITA
2
Win
Played
3
Win
Head-to-head: Maestrelli 2 - 3 Gigante
They have played 12 sets in total, with Francesco Maestrelli winning 5 and Matteo Gigante winning 7. The last match between Matteo Gigante and Francesco Maestrelli was at the Rome Challenger, 25-04-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Matteo Gigante getting the victory 6-7(6) 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maestrelli | 2 |
| Gigante | 3 |
Last 5 H2H Matches:
(QF) Rome Challenger(04-25-25)
(Q3) Turin Challenger(05-15-24)
(SF) Tenerife 2 Challenger(02-24-24)
F. Maestrelli vs M. Gigante H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $11,285 | Career Prize Money | $571,445 |
| 54.76% (190-157) | Career Total W/L | 57.68% (169-124) |
| 1 | Clay | 2 |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 5 | Titles | 6 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 3 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (5-5) |
F. Maestrelli vs M. Gigante Match Preview:
When it comes to serving up second serves, Maestrelli narrowly sips more victory juice, winning 44.03% of points compared to Gigante's 42.63%. It’s a neck-and-neck race, but Maestrelli is squeezing out just a tad more zest from that second serve lemon. This slice of performance pie often links up with how we predict tennis match outcomes, making it a delightful stat to savor over your morning croissant.
Turning our heads to return game stats, Gigante appears to have a slight edge by snatching 50.92% of points from opponents' second serves, outpacing Maestrelli, who bagged 45.7%. A parallel pattern emerges in first serve returns, with Maestrelli catching 27.38% of first serve points while Gigante is close on his heels with 26.21%. This quirky tango of numbers could indeed illuminate the favorite in this head-to-head tango, especially when analyzing the return prowess.
In the realm of pressure handling, Maestrelli demonstrates an uncanny ability to dodge breakpoints like a pro matador, saving 55.81% of them. Gigante, fending off 44.97%, is still trying to perfect that escape artist act. This statistic holds value not just for the curious onlookers but also for those diving into the ultimate betting escapades.
Over the past year, Maestrelli has been evenly splitting wins like a confused referee, holding onto a balanced 50% of his matches. Meanwhile, Gigante snatches a slight upper hand, winning 52.73% of the battles he partook in. As we peruse this grand tally, it's naturally the head-turning indicator of who’s been racking up experience and victories.
When it comes to surfaces, Maestrelli seems to thrive when the planet is Hard, bouncing to a commendable 56%. But throw him on Grass, and it seems like his spikes have turned to noodles with a win percentage that's an absolute zero. Gigante, however, struts the Hard surfaces, boasting a refreshing 71% win rate, but is left scratching his head on I., managing only 26% success.
Both players have tickled the Challengers/ITF circuits over $10K in the past year. Maestrelli's win rate struts at 45.45% while Gigante slightly nudges ahead with 52.78%. These delightful nuggets of player level participation are as tasty as they are telling, giving us a hint of stamina and experience on the somewhat pastel wrestling grounds of tennis.
Their head-to-head history reads like an enthralling detective novel, with both players snatching two victories each in their four bouts. Maestrelli leads 1 tiebreak to nil and won their last encounter at the Turin Challenger, victorious in a slick 7-6(2) 6-2. Their match duration averages more than one and a half-hour spectacles, making it an electrifying armchair experience.
Finally, peek into the future—if this duel stretches into a deciding set, Maestrelli's ability to seal the deal historically stands at 62%, while Gigante impresses with 69% success in such cliffhangers. However, with Gigante's trump cards in breakpoints and recent surface performance, it seems he might just tip-toe triumphantly out of this showdown. So, place your speculative jests on Gigante, the probable champion of the stats!
Francesco Maestrelli vs Matteo Gigante Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Maestrelli vs M. Gigante H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 3 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 7 |
| 47 | Games Won | 60 |
| 25 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 1:42:33 | Average Match Time | 1:42:33 |
| 59% (188/320) | 1st Serve % | 61% (226/369) |
| 68% (127/188) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (148/226) |
| 42% (56/132) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (75/143) |
| 27% (11/41) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (18/36) |
| 40% (146/369) | Return Points Win % | 43% (137/320) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (1/3) |
| 33% (1/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Maestrelli Recent Matches Played
M. Gigante Recent Matches Played

F. Maestrelli vs M. Gigante Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.76% (190/157) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.68% (169/124) |
| 52.84% (428/382) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.33% (384/310) |
| 51.14% (3953/3777) | Games Win/Loss | 51.96% (3409/3152) |
| 56.25% (45/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.44% (58/28) |
| 55.91% (123/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.26% (96/66) |
| 50.00% (22/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27.78% (10/26) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.56% (5/4) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1578 | Aces Total | 934 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1127 | Total Double Faults | 1012 |
| 1:45:31 | Average Match Time | 1:35:50 |
| 377.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 357.33 |
| 61% (14183/23372) | 1st Serve % | 59% (11812/19965) |
| 69% (9819/14183) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (8068/11812) |
| 46% (4248/9189) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4031/8153) |
| 43% (999/2307) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (920/2128) |
| 40% (9455/23513) | Return Points Win % | 41% (8280/20212) |
| 30.77% (4/9) | Slam W/L | 57.69% (15/11) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Main Tour W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 53.48% (123/107) | Challenger W/L | 57.07% (109/82) |
| 65.59% (61/32) | Futures W/L | 72.55% (37/14) |
| 54% (187/344) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (164/281) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 56% (59/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (51/91) |
| 57% (68/119) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (59/103) |
| 89% (157/140) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (173/137) |
| 11% (157/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (173/34) |
| 25% (190/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (120/30) |